Comments on: IBEC Pulling Plug On BPL Internet Service In Nelson And Other Areas

By: Nelson County Life

Nelson County Life — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:21:47 +0000

Gen 4? Haven’t heard about that one yet.

By: Erik

Erik — Tue, 13 Mar 2012 18:49:39 +0000

Looking into Hughesnet – Gen4. This may be an option.

By: Scott R

Scott R — Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:24:08 +0000

So glad I bailed on IBEC two years ago! I was part of the original (Colleen) setup and it never worked…ever…reliably. I’m so entirely unsurprised by this.

By: Nelson County Life

Nelson County Life — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:30:15 +0000

Erik,

I would say many folks should start getting service by the fall of this year. Not great news for people needing it now, but still lots of infrastructure to build out between now and then. Tommy

By: Erik

Erik — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:34:39 +0000

Any more word on a time-line?

By: Nelson County Life

Nelson County Life — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:21:38 +0000

Erik,
My understanding is this will be delivered in a variety of ways. Some will get it by direct connection. If you are lucky enough to be near the backbone like our office, you could conceivably have true end to end fiber. Others will have mostly fiber, then perhaps some copper to bridge. The ones that are too far away will be bridged via wireless towers that are being constructed as we speak. Tommy

By: Erik

Erik — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:02:29 +0000

Well…. last night I made the call to the dial-up provider. This is quite painful to say the least.

I wish there was a stop-gap solution until the new service is up and running. Which brings me to another question; How will this reach individual homes? By wire (fiber) or by radio? Because folks like me who have zero cell service at home might be wondering how a non hard-wired solution will even reach us.

Thanks.

By: Dawnjmh

Dawnjmh — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:22:44 +0000

I live in Indiana and we just lost our service at the end of January. I really liked the BPL/IBEC service. I only live about 15 miles south of Indianapolis, but outside of the city limits of Mooresville. We have nothing out here. AOL is so unbelievably slow and I’m talking 5 minutes to open a page. I am so upset about losing this service and having to go back to dial up. I as well as many others can’t afford satellite for internet service.

By: Kevin Rose

Kevin Rose — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 01:05:37 +0000

Okay, I just found out about this, sorry Tommy I haven’t been the “Life” as thoroughly as I should. No notice from IBEC by mail or email. This is tragic news. Theoretically, there will be less people with “broadband” by the time they get the NC trunk dug and connected. Only providers that can risk the cost of running fiber, getting towers approved, and getting enough customers to cover their overhead will be available to the more rural parts of the county. It will be like it was before electricity. Some county customers will be lucky enough not to live in a hollow and they will be in “line of sight” of these towers that are proposed. You may get some connectivity without line of sight, but it will be limited, spotty, and depends on seasonal growth. Mark my words, the loss of a provider like IBEC will mean that most of us will not have access to “broadband” unless you have satellite, for a number of years. I had satellite before IBEC since 2001 and I’m not going back to that rip-off. I went through four $100 upgrades in 8 years and paid $70 dollars a month for it (after buying the original for $200). I still think that the money would have been better spent if we were installing fiber from the existing Verizon trunk. But I will say that without knowing or seeing the “plan” or its justification, I’m in a dark hollow. I’ve had a weather station and webcam up for years now in Rockfish, but I feel that is going to end for a long while. And because of the load time of spectacular pictures and video, I will be further in the dark because I won’t be able to read the “Life”.

By: Tommy

Tommy — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:24:22 +0000

Thanks for chiming in BIll. Though I am not sure why my political leanings have to do with anything, I was at one time a conservative, still am, just not s republican conservative. I think both democrats and republicans pretty much have the same agenda. But that’s for another discussion. I can’t disagree with ARRL’s position on this. IMO, BPL was never a viable technology for providing reliable widespread true broadband internet. BPL in Nelson never met the criteria of real broadband. Perhaps it reached speeds of now defunct ISDN lines of the old days, but it never even got to speeds of 1mbps. The lowest end of the standard for DSL and other modes of broadband. Another problem, BPL in a rural setting. In a metro area, or even small towns, the electrical systems/grid that BPL relies on is in better shape. Not to say CVEC has a bad system, to the contrary, but sheer geography in Nelson plays a large part. Having an insulator cracked here or there, which would have little hinderance on delivering electrical power, plays havoc with delivering a clean broadband signal. The same could be said for transformers, etc. BPL did certainly ply havoc with amateur radio bands for sure.

Overall, I put this IBEC project in the bucket with the Solyndra’s of the day. Great ideas, some merit, but almost no ability to sustain themselves with being propped up by the government, and even then they generally don’t make it because their goal is to high for the areas they implement in.

By: Bill

Bill — Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:53:11 +0000

[to Tommy - More in-depth about shut-down would be valuable here. Some ?'s to look into I'll put in the below response to Ed Hare, W1RFIG (above). Glad to see though that you have healthy skepticism about future services. You must be a small "c" conservative, as I've heard you lean that way. I think the biggest players in all industries cry and whine when their monpolies are threatened. Hence the breakdown in governing we have now.]
Ed Hare, W1RFIG, your group, ARRL (initials unknown, calling itself “the national association for amateur radio) cites you, as their Laboratory Manager, with saying that “IBEC’s closure is good news” (to quote their site). Putting any broader (and perhaps valid) debates aside, I have to say that your post’s review of facts appear to be a view from a jaundiced eye. Your indictment of a system against which your organisation, over a year ago, filed a complaint with the FCC seems pretty disingenuous in light of this conflict with your special interests.
Nevertheless, as a supporter of rural cooperative endeavors and an IBEC customer, I will address some of your points:
1.About short notice to customers – though I’m disappointed, it seems like 4 weeks+/- notice is about right. It’s enough time to find some alternative but not so long that it cuts their own throat as to revenues to cover as many of their obligations as they can. Your gushing about French Broad Co-op (NOT the customer here, as you state, but the utility) being “blindsided”, as if you care, could not be – they only have 200 customers! Which is why . . .
2. the “rather telling fact” is that these systems are deployed in small increments, as we here in Nelson County have experienced; first an experimental rollout (Colleen), then a modest expansion into an area with a broader market base – to gain a much needed revenue stream to pay for itself (Faber, Martin’s Store, Nellysford, Greenfield and Afton). How many customers from Nelson were there, one county out of 14 covered by CVEC (which has 33,000 total customers)?
3.In your over two years of field yests, many customers experienced some outages early on (About the “few” complainers: dissatisfied customers are far more likely to voice an opinion than satisfied ones). There were a few technical issues but many involved the great difficulties coordinating the service with the T-1 carrier and servicer (AT&T and Verizon). Sure, equipment failures (incl. at least one local T-1 by Verizon), testing, system reconfiguring etc., were early problems that made for frustrating service outages, but I’ve had dependable service for all but the first 4 mos. or so (I am excluding a couple of outages that occurred a year or so ago. These happened at the same time that Verizon was having so many problems with dropped service all across it’s network, throughout the country. Is that implicated here?)
4.How can you assert that bpl does not work past “the width of a few buildings”? I’m over 1 1/2 miles on a dirt private lane and then two more miles to the T-1 “injection” point. And there is no ethernet cabling here, well engineered or not – nothing scientific about that!
5.5 times dial-up speed depends on who’s measuring. I was never able to connect at more than 44Kbps but it was mostly 33Kbps or some 38Kbps. When last I checked I could not acheive greater than 24Kbps if that. So, my IBEC service is for 256Kbps, over 10 times what dial-up is. Moreover, when speed-checked at IBEC srvc. and at speedtest.com(?sitename), the download speed was over 400 Kbps, w/upload at just under 200Kbps (a typical discrepancy, I’m told). That’s what, 16 times dial-up? And, I had the option of getting 1Mbps service from IBEC, making it 35-40 times faster.
Anyway, IBEC is dead. A lot of its problems were the direct result of terrible weather: flooding during our deployment, snowmaggedon that winter, and finally the tornado disasters of last year in its home state (and largest deployment) of Alabama. But the real death-knell of IBEC has been the competing, sometimes opposing, interests of corporations and a disinterested legislative and regulatory bureaucracy. The foot-dragging and bureaucracy by Verizon seemed to be the cause of much of the early delays in deployment. I can’t see that they could have had much, if any, incentive to act with diligence or expedience. The insurance claim refusal was a huge “blow” (though the insurer didn’t cause any tornados). I don’t know the facts of the case, but I don’t think that a claim would have been submitted had IBEC not believed it was covered. From this came a cascade of financial events: an investor reneging on a commitment, their assistance requests to their federal credtor, RUS, turned down, and so on.
Most dismaying was the withholding of any federal help that was already available for such projects. Read the 2nd-to-last paragraph of IBEC’s letter to the customers (click on the lower of the two notices above in this news post to enlarge). This, combined with the number of commenters above who don’t understand that MANY places in Nelson have no broadband alternative except satellite which is: not quite as fast as IBEC (I’ve heard); not available when it’s cloudy,raining,snowing etc.; costs more (is there a contract as well?); and, to allow a clear shot from dish to satellite, may require the removal of trees (adding cost) or even, in some cases, mountaintop removal (HA! Thats really gonna cost ya!). Finding a new service will be a choice between bad choice for awhile yet.

By: Determining Broadband Availability in the Charlottesville MSA | | RealCentralVA.comRealCentralVA.com

Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:16:13 +0000

[...] 1b – If you’re really interested, the only way to ensure there is broadband service is to contact the service provider. In the Charlottesville MSA, we have Comcast, Embarq, Blue Ridge Internetworks, Verizon in some of the outlying areas, and a couple smaller fiber providers. *Nelson County just lost some broadband connectivity. [...]

By: Gary thayer

Gary thayer — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:02:46 +0000

I have helped 5 ibec broadband customers get back on line with high speed wireless Internet. If a Verizon cellphone works at your house i can help with a alternative to dialup 540-236-2979

By: Erik

Erik — Wed, 04 Jan 2012 03:39:48 +0000

What are the promised speeds for this “new” service?

By: Ed Hare, W1RFI

Ed Hare, W1RFI — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 22:21:21 +0000

I forgot the URL:

http://www.arrl.org/news/bpl-provider-ibec-announces-shutdown